Processing...
ThePacker.comCitrusAndVegetable.comTheGrower.comProduceRetailer.comrbcs.comProduceMarketGuide.comGreenbook.net

Fresh Talk Blog

Fill in the blank: PTI needs a .....

Published on 01/25/2010 08:46AM

Average Rating: (5)

Bookmark
Friend's Email* 
2nd Email
3rd Email
Your Email*
Subject*
Message
Verify:
  Refresh
 
The Produce Traceability Initiative needs a(n) _______. How would you fill in the blank? I might say it needs an energy drink.
    
The last update to the Produce Traceability Web site  was Dec. 3, 2009.

Gary Fleming, formerly the lead PMA expert on traceability and the PTI  seemed less  than optimistic about retail readiness for scanning produce cases as dictated by the PTI timeline, at least in  coverage  of the recent traceability event in Denver from Marler’s site Food  Safety News.

From that coverage:

None other than Gary Fleming, who was one of the founding fathers of the Produce  Traceability Initiative (PTI) is wondering whether enough retailers will demand  use of the barcode-based tracking system to make its planned 2012 launch  effective.  Fleming is a supply chain expert and president of the Symolon Group.

   
Is the remark by Fleming surprising? Not so much, as it is merely acknowledging  reality in a “permission to speak freely sir?” moment.  We can safely assume Gary  is still 100% behind PTI. Also, from the same story:

Dr. David Acheson, who was until the middle of last year Associate Commissioner of  Foods at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said the agency promised  "guidance" on traceability that was due out last October will probably never be released.  Acheson, who is now managing director of Food and Import Safety Practice for  Leavitt Partners, says now FDA is more likely to wait for Congress to pass food  safety reform legislation and then just begin to implement the new law, which will  contain some specific requirements on traceability.

I am not  disputing that traceability is necessary the produce industry  (in fact, we already have a good measure of it, don’t we?) , but huge questions  remain about the issue:

What will Congress/FDA do regarding traceability regulations? In particular, how will smaller growers be  accounted for? I don’t think we can expect the organic tomato grower in New Jersey  to have the same traceability systems in place as a packaged salad manufacturer in  Salinas.  How Congress deals with traceability – and more importantly, how FDA  translates the law into regulation – need to  validate the effort and expense for PTI. Otherwise, the question will be asked, why?

Will traceability be mandatory? See above

What is the exact measure of participation/investment in PTI?  Here is something  that could be helpful;; there is a list of companies who “endorse the PTI” on the  PTI Web site, including multiple retailers.   I would like to have each of those "endorsing companies" to provide monthly (or quarterly) updates on their progress on the various  milestones.  In other words, a retailer could say: “On track” for PTI implementation for scanning of inbound cases by 2011,  perhaps adding an asterisk  indicating their commitment to buy from PTI compliant suppliers when that day comes.

Where are the “best practices” for important milestones? They aren’t done yet.  

From the PTI Web site:

Scanning of inbound cases (2011)
Q: Are there best practices for reading and storing this information off of each  and every case of produce received?
A: The Best Practices for this activity are pending; it will be provided at a  later date.

Scanning outbound cases (2012)

Q: Are there best practices for reading and storing this information off of each and every case of produce shipped?
A: The Best Practices for this activity are pending; they will be provided at a  later date.


Perhaps setting the PTI timeline was premature absent best practices to execute it.

What is the cost to the supply chain?  I have heard retailers sometimes figure  what retail price they want to merchandiser produce at and then work backward to  the supplier to get the f.o.b. price they need. Why not engineer the best  traceability system you can get for x cents per case and make it happen?  Can we  have a Cadillac traceability system in a Nissan economy? The lack of a comprehensive study on the costs and benefits of traceability through the supply chain is a shortcoming to PTI.

One more thought: the PTI could have benefitted from more open trade press coverage of its meetings. In fact, why not open up the next meeting of the steering committee to the trade press? Creating a more transparent process may aid  understanding about the need and urgency of the initiative, and could have help to measure the actual buy-in passion of participants.

The PTI needs.... . A three-year energy drink might be a place to start.
Back to Fresh Talk Blog
The Packer encourages your respectful comments relative to the issues in this and any story.  But we will remove any posts containing the following:
1. Profanity
2. Personal attacks of any kind
3. Advertising messages or SPAM
Thank you!  
- The Packer Staff
Wes KlineJanuary 26, 2010 08:13
I think your artilce is right on target. Many small and mid size growers feel PTI is being pushed on them without any idea what it is going to cost. The whole plan seems to have been developed behind closed doors then everyone else was told this is it. Do it.
Just Unpacked - Related Items
View The Packer's video coverage of the Culinary Institute of America's recent Worlds of Healthy Flavors and Produce First! conferences.
The U.S. Potato Board, Denver, gathered to discuss a variety of spud-related issues at its annual meeting March 10-12.
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Top StoriesCrops & Markets | Handling & Distributing | Opinion | Retail | Foodservice | Special Sections
Industry Events | Market Scope | Fresh Trends | Packer 25 | RSS Feeds | Video/Audio | Slide Shows | Fresh Talk Blog | Staff Directory
The Packer, Produce Retailer, Produce Availability & Merchandising Guide and Fresh
Trends are registered trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Copyright 2010 Vance Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.
Vance Marketing Solutions  |  List Rental


Feedback Form
PGT: 2.54 sec